|
Due to the distortion of the craft and its essence by many astrological disciplines, numerous misconceptions abound – all serve to further distort the reality. AORTA deals with one misconception per month and helps you understand why it is not valid. If you have any astrological notions requiring clarification, we would welcome your input.
|
|
An Astrological Misconception: Astrology is a forgotten language |
|
|
|
|
Written by Jacqueline Brook
|
|
It is thought that modern man is completely removed from the traditional astrological realm, yet our language indicates otherwise.
Many of the aphorisms we use today in common speech are derived from astrological language: if we could invest time in pondering the origin of these words and their true meaning, we could begin to reclaim the understanding of the cosmos and its hidden beauty, which is able to assist us with our daily lives and relationships. It is most enjoyable to think about the origin of phrases and to find the planetary signatures for them: what is said in jest about a person is often a profound truth which can be found in their birth chart. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
An Astrological Misconception: Astrologers vs. Paul the octopus: who is more “right”? |
|
|
|
|
Written by Jacqueline Brook
|
|
The recent 2010 FIFA World Cup provided a wonderful opportunity not only for astrologers, but for all and sundry who ply their trade in the predictive realm, to show what they were made of. Anyone engaged in this pursuit, provided they are of an above average intelligence quota, realizes that when it comes to predictions or forecasts, there is always room for error. When you are delving into areas unknown, any level of skill or aptitude needs to bow in reverence to greater powers, and to concede that whilst trapped in our physical bodies in the mundane plane, we will never know it all. I am confident that Paul the octopus knows this too, as he incorrectly predicted the outcome of the European final, citing Germany to beat Spain.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
An Astrological Misconception: Traditional Astrology is the "Old Stuff" |
|
|
|
|
Written by Jacqueline Brook
|
|
Confusion exists as to what the definitions of the different disciplines and their fundamental differences are; it is commonly believed that traditional astrology is the ‘old stuff', almost like a vintage car. Medieval and traditional astrology are also viewed as synonymous when in fact they are not; in principle medieval is part of traditional astrology as it stems from a time period within the Tradition itself.
There is something very wrong though in trying to pin traditional astrology, as an entity, down to any one point of time and place, as much of the work done in ancient times is anti traditionalist in its approach. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
An Astrological Misconception: the Maya Calendar and the end of the world in 2012 |
|
|
|
|
Written by Jacqueline Brook
|
|
Throughout history, end-of-the-world movements missing their mark number in the "hundreds of thousands at the very least”, says Richard Landes, historian at Boston University and director of its Centre for Millennial Studies. But people eager for the world to end are not to be denied, and this time, of course, all will be different.
Man, for some strange reason, often appears to be more interested in when his planet and the human species will end, as opposed to nurturing it (and others). We do not have the power to save the planet nor to end its life, but we most certainly do have the power to make our stay here more pleasurable, meaningful and educational. The frenzy that surrounds prophecies, theories and conjectures surrounding the end of the world is as old as the species of man; one can only wonder why this is, as it makes no rational (or spiritual) sense at all.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
An Astrological Misconception: the relevance of a rising or Ascendant sign |
|
|
|
|
Written by Jacqueline Brook
|
|
Many people, even those who know very little about astrology, appear to have knowledge of their Sun (star) sign and their Ascendant (rising) sign. Great emphasis is placed on these two snippets of information and as an astrologer you are expected to smile knowingly and then burst forth into a rendition of astrological psycho babble when presented with this information. We have addressed the star sign misconception in a previous edition of the Planets and You and we now turn our attention to the rising sign.
Here we encounter another major difference between our astrology and modern astrology. Signs do not do anything; they simply describe the planets that are posited in them. They are adjectives while the planets are nouns, and the aspects are verbs. These 12 adjectives each have a set of characteristics, but they do not have the fully-fledged and inflated personalities allotted to them in modern astrology. They will be masculine or feminine, barren or fertile, mute or voiced and humane or bestial, and some are even maimed. Each sign is categorised by an element and by a mode or quality, which further adds to its characteristics. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 3 |